Chapters in “Neuroscience and Legal Responsibility”
Thanks to the Library of Congress, you can now take a sneak peek at the contents of my forthcoming edited volume “Neuroscience and Legal Responsibility” with OUP,… or just see below:
- Introduction
Nicole A Vincent - Criminal common law compatibilism
Stephen J. Morse - What can neurosciences say about responsibility? : taking the distinction between theoretical and practical reason seriously
Anne Ruth Mackor - Irrationality, mental capacities and neuroscience
Jillian Craigie & Alicia Coram - Skepticism concerning human agency : sciences of the self vs. “voluntariness” in the law
Paul Sheldon Davies - The implications of heuristics and biases research on moral and legal responsibility : a case against the reasonable person standard
Leora Dahan-Katz - Moral responsibility and consciousness : two challenges, one solution
Neil Levy - Translating scientific evidence into the language of the “folk” : executive function as capacity-responsibility
Katrina L. Sifferd - Neuroscience, deviant appetites and the criminal law
Colin Gavaghan - Is psychopathy a mental disease?
Thomas Nadelhoffer & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - Addiction, choice, and disease : how voluntary is voluntary action in addiction?
Jeanette Kennett - How may neuroscience affect the way that the criminal courts deal with addicted offenders?
Wayne Hall & Adrian Carter - Enhancing Responsibility
Nicole A Vincent - Guilty minds in washed brains? : manipulation cases, excuses and the normative prerequisites of liberal legal orders
Jan Christoph Bublitz & Reinhard Merkel
Stay tuned for more info.